- StableScope
- Posts
- Onigiri Weekend Digest: Institutional Lens #8
Onigiri Weekend Digest: Institutional Lens #8

🌐 Website | 💼 Linkedln | 📰 Past Editions
Good weekend from Onigiri Capital!
This week, we zoom into the developments from the Bank of England and the Monetary Authority of Singapore, highlighting a gradual but unmistakable shift in how advanced financial jurisdictions are approaching stablecoins.
Recap this Week's Headliners
SS#47 - UK Central Bank Proposes Strict Stablecoin Regime
SS#48 - Singapore Regulates Stablecoins, Pilots CBDC
The UK is introducing a cautious, stability-first framework for systemic sterling stablecoins, while Singapore is moving toward operationalizing tokenized finance through wholesale CBDC settlement trials and forthcoming stablecoin legislation. Although the approaches differ, both point toward the same broader direction: stablecoins are increasingly being shaped to operate alongside — not outside — existing monetary and financial systems.
For Onigiri, the key takeaway is that the next phase of the stablecoin market will be defined less by rapid retail adoption and more by measured regulatory integration, institutional safeguards, and compatibility with real-world financial infrastructure. The jurisdictions setting clearer standards today are likely to shape how stablecoins evolve globally, and issuers that adapt early to these expectations will be best positioned to serve institutional users, support tokenized asset markets, and participate in emerging cross-border settlement frameworks.
Enjoy the read!
You read and share. We listen and improve. Send us feedback at [email protected].
For daily market updates and airdrop alphas, check out our telegram!

🍙Onigiri Take
Across the UK and Singapore, a consistent pattern is emerging:
Stability and monetary alignment now dominate policy design. Regulators view stablecoins not just as payment tools but as potential settlement assets with macro-financial implications.
Institutional usage is becoming the anchor use case. Tokenized bills, wholesale CBDC pilots, and high-quality reserve mandates point toward a stablecoin market built for financial institutions, corporates, and regulated intermediaries.
Regulatory clarity is becoming a competitive differentiator. Jurisdictions offering structured, enforceable, and credible frameworks will attract quality issuers and institutional capital.
A dual-track stablecoin ecosystem will emerge:
Institution-grade stablecoins with explicit reserve, redemption, and governance requirements
Crypto-native stablecoins remaining within DeFi and retail markets under lighter regimes
Onigiri’s view: Stablecoins are entering a phase defined by regulatory convergence, operational discipline, and integration with tokenized financial infrastructure. Issuers capable of meeting these expectations will be positioned to play central roles in the next wave of institutional digital finance.
🍙Winners & Losers: Institutional Outlook
Stakeholder Group | Winners/Losers | Why it Matters |
Major Stablecoin Issuers | Conditional winners with smaller/ under-resourced issuers being at disadvantage | High-bar regimes favour issuers with robust governance and transparent reserves. |
Banks & Financial Institutions | Winners with mid-tier banks slower to adapt | Holding limits protect deposits (UK), while CBDC-settled tokenized bills create new institutional roles (SG). |
Regulators | Winners | Stronger regulatory footing and international signalling power. |
Corporates & Enterprises | Neutral to Winners | Long-term benefit from safer, regulated stablecoins; short-term adaptation costs likely. |
Retail Users & Crypto Natives | Mixed with high-yield stablecoin users at the losing end | More protection but potentially reduced yield/choice under stricter rules. |
Developers & Protocol Founders | Winners | Clearer frameworks enable institutional-grade DeFi and tokenization products. |
Institutional Investors & VCs | Winners | Regulatory clarity expands investable opportunities and reduces governance risk. |
Infrastructure & Service Providers | Winners | Growth in custody, compliance, tokenization, and settlement solutions. |
DAOs & Governance Communities | Relative Losers | Less alignment with highly supervised, jurisdiction-bound models. |
Exchanges & Market Infrastructure | Winners | Institutional demand rises for compliant stablecoins as settlement assets. |
🍙Under the Hood: What the UK and Singapore Are Really Signalling
1. United Kingdom — A Stability-First Systemic Framework
The Bank of England proposes a model aimed at mitigating systemic risk and deposit displacement:
Temporary holding caps: £20k per individual, £10m per business
Reserve structure: 40% unremunerated BOE deposits, 60% short-term UK sovereign debt
Two-tier regime: systemic coins supervised by BOE, non-systemic coins by FCA
This model directly addresses risks identified by BIS/FSB, including:
illicit finance exposure
run risk
reserve opacity
cross-border supervisory gaps
The UK is prioritizing monetary stability and financial system protection over rapid market scaling. It is unlikely to attract all issuers, but those able to meet the standards will gain a reputational premium.
2. Singapore — Bridging Tokenization with Real-World Settlement
MAS is advancing on two coordinated tracks:
a. Tokenized government bills with wholesale CBDC settlement
Enables secure, on-chain delivery-versus-payment
Supports the broader Project Guardian initiative
Positions tokenization as a viable financial-market infrastructure layer
b. New stablecoin legislation
Focus on reserve quality, redemption reliability, and governance
Designed to attract global stablecoin issuers seeking a high-trust jurisdiction
Complements Singapore’s role as a hub for digital assets, capital markets, and institutional liquidity
Singapore’s approach is pragmatic and commercially aligned, aiming to create usable, interoperable digital money rails for the financial industry.
🍙Stablecoin ≠ Crypto — Stablecoins as Regulated Digital Money Infrastructure
The UK and Singapore both reinforce a structural distinction:
Stablecoins are being shaped as digital settlement assets, not speculative instruments.
Regulatory frameworks increasingly resemble prudential or payments regulation, not crypto-asset treatment.
Interoperability with banking and capital markets — not retail crypto usage — is becoming the anchor design goal.
This evolves stablecoins into:
trusted instruments for corporate and institutional payments
settlement assets for tokenized securities
components of cross-border liquidity networks
complements (not competitors) to central bank digital initiatives
Stablecoins are moving toward a role that is adjacent to sovereign money, not outside it.
🍙Institutional Risks & Unknowns
Stablecoins continue to present illicit finance risks due to pseudonymous transfers and the ability to bypass regulated intermediaries, prompting jurisdictions to strengthen AML/CFT oversight.
In markets facing currency instability, increased reliance on USD stablecoins may erode domestic monetary sovereignty and accelerate capital outflows.
Vulnerabilities such as opaque reserves, uninsured deposits, and past de-pegs underscore the need for stronger reserve, risk management, and redemption standards, which regulators like the UK and Singapore are now formalizing.
Persistent differences in national regulatory approaches create opportunities for cross-border arbitrage and uneven enforcement, highlighting the ongoing challenge of achieving global regulatory alignment.


Onigiri Capital (onigiri.vc), a US$50 million blockchain-focused investment fund, launched by Saison Capital, the venture arm of Japan’s Credit Saison. Onigiri Capital is on a mission to chart the next chapter of finance and invest in seed and Series A blockchain startups in stablecoins, payments, RWAs, DeFi and financial infrastructure. The fund’s strategy emphasizes connecting startups to Asia’s growing digital asset markets.
If you'd like to discuss or contribute to the next Institutional Lens, contact us at [email protected]
Disclaimer: All the information presented in this publication and its affiliates is strictly for educational purposes only. It should not be construed or taken as financial, legal, investment, or any other form of advice.
1