- StableScope
- Posts
- Onigiri Weekend Digest: Institutional Lens #5
Onigiri Weekend Digest: Institutional Lens #5

🌐 Website | 💼 Linkedln | 📰 Past Editions
Good weekend from Onigiri Capital!
This week, two defining moments capture the political and regulatory power struggle shaping the next phase of global stablecoin adoption.
Recap this Week's Headliners
SS #41 - China's PBoC Overrides HK Stablecoin Plans
SS #42 - Warren Demands Treasury Block Stablecoin 'Conflicts’
Both developments underscore a single truth: stablecoins are no longer a crypto issue — they are now instruments of state power in both the East and West. The Fed Fintech Meeting (Oct 21, D.C.) —also showed signals: The Fed moves from adversarial to dialogic: interoperability, “slim master accounts” for payments firms, and stablecoins as AI and tokenization plumbing.
You read and share. We listen and improve. Send us feedback at [email protected].
For daily market updates and airdrop alphas, check out our telegram!

🍙Onigiri Take
The global stablecoin narrative has entered a monetary realpolitik phase. Beijing’s intervention in Hong Kong signals that sovereign currencies cannot coexist with private money, especially when monetary control is strategic. Meanwhile, Washington’s political wrangling shows that stablecoins have crossed the Rubicon into statecraft, no longer viewed as neutral financial tools.
China’s move reinforces the dominance of the e-CNY and effectively ends hopes for an offshore CNH stablecoin regime, isolating Hong Kong’s ambitions.
Warren’s demands expand U.S. oversight from compliance to integrity of governance, establishing a precedent where who backs a stablecoin is as important as how it operates.
For institutional allocators, the message is clear: The new moat is compliance credibility. The winners of this cycle will not be the most innovative issuers — but those who can navigate political legitimacy and regulatory proximity.
🍙Winners & Losers: Institutional Outlook
Stakeholder | This Week’s Impact | Outlook & Actions |
Major Stablecoin Issuers | CNH path shut; U.S. governance bar rising | Double-down on USD issuance, conflict disclosures, ops audits, and Fed-compatible connectivity. |
Banks & Financial Institutions | CNH optionality curtailed; U.S. rails opening | Position for tokenized deposits, sweeps to MMFs, and issuer partnerships under GENIUS + Fed guidance. |
Regulators | PBoC consolidates; Treasury ascendant | Write interoperability + resilience rules; define red lines on conflicts, interest-like rewards. |
Corporates & Enterprises | Higher compliance overhead | Prefer licensed USD rails; require service-level and reversal/recourse designs. |
Retail Users & Crypto Natives | Fragmented access; UX still clunky | Gravitate to regulated USD and exchange-integrated flows; watch fees and limits. |
Developers & Protocol Founders | Interop + compliance constraints | Build Reg-DeFi variants (policy-aware smart contracts), address-lists, oracle QA. |
Institutional Investors & VCs | Policy risk repriced | Favor issuer equity and compliance infra; avoid CNH-dependent theses. |
Infrastructure & Service Providers | Tailwinds for risk & reporting | Growth in real-time attestation, incident response, fraud/AI models, Treasury ops. |
DAOs & Governance Communities | Lower tolerance for opacity | Hard-code disclosure, key-man/related-party limits, and emergency controls. |
Exchanges & Market Infra (CCPs/FCMs/ATSs) | Licensed venues advantaged | Integrate USD stables with clear redemption SLAs; segregate tokenized assets by credit/liquidity tiers. |
🍙Under the Hood: State Control, Regulatory Capture, and the Future of “Permissioned” Stablecoins
Beijing’s Command over Capital Mobility
Hong Kong’s experiment with a CNH-pegged stablecoin has been halted. The PBoC’s directive to Ant Group and JD.com isn’t merely about monetary control — it’s about data control.
A successful offshore CNH stablecoin would have generated non-state transaction data, effectively creating a shadow payment system parallel to the e-CNY. Now, Beijing’s stance aligns its Digital Currency Electronic Payment (DCEP) strategy with capital account containment, ensuring RMB internationalization remains state-managed, not market-driven.Washington’s Political Oversight Phase
Warren’s pressure campaign against the Treasury stems from the GENIUS Act’s unintended ambiguities — particularly around conflicts of interest and operational governance. The reference to the World Liberty Financial USD stablecoin and Trump-linked backers underscores a deeper fear: that private issuers could wield political leverage through monetary rails.
The Structural Divergence
China’s model: Centralized CBDC dominance, zero tolerance for private fiat proxies.
U.S. model: Private-public co-regulation, but with political gatekeeping at the Treasury level.
The result is a bifurcated stablecoin world — one shaped by state monopoly (East) and political legitimacy (West).
🍙Stablecoin ≠ Crypto — From Open Networks to State-Vetted Money Rails
Stablecoins were once the crypto industry’s Trojan horse into mainstream finance. They are now becoming the state’s firewall against uncontrolled liquidity. The reclassification is underway — stablecoins are no longer “crypto assets,” but regulated financial instruments with sovereign implications.
This shift creates a new design frontier:
Permissioned interoperability layers bridging compliant stablecoins with DeFi rails.
Tokenized bank money replacing synthetic stablecoins as the preferred institutional format.
RegTech-native architecture, where transaction-level attestations replace “proof of reserves.”
The distinction between “crypto” and “digital money” will define institutional adoption. Stablecoins that look like bank deposits will survive. Those that look like tokens will not.
🍙Institutional Risks & Unknowns
Category | Key Concern | Implication |
Regulatory Capture | Treasury overreach and political selectivity in GENIUS Act implementation | Issuers may face arbitrary enforcement or politicized licensing. |
Monetary Fragmentation | China’s firewall limits CNH interoperability | ASEAN, HK, and offshore RMB liquidity may stagnate. |
Operational Integrity | Failures like Paxos’s $3T minting glitch raise systemic questions | Stronger stress testing, multi-sig governance, and Treasury oversight incoming. |
Geopolitical Risk | Stablecoins increasingly viewed as strategic infrastructure | Cross-border issuance may require state-level approval, not just compliance. |
Market Concentration | USD stablecoins absorbing all liquidity | Creates single-currency dependence and higher contagion risk in global markets. |


Onigiri Capital (onigiri.vc), a US$50 million blockchain-focused investment fund, launched by Saison Capital, the venture arm of Japan’s Credit Saison. Onigiri Capital is on a mission to chart the next chapter of finance and invest in seed and Series A blockchain startups in stablecoins, payments, RWAs, DeFi and financial infrastructure. The fund’s strategy emphasizes connecting startups to Asia’s growing digital asset markets.
If you'd like to discuss or contribute to the next Institutional Lens, contact us at [email protected]
Disclaimer: All the information presented in this publication and its affiliates is strictly for educational purposes only. It should not be construed or taken as financial, legal, investment, or any other form of advice.