• StableScope
  • Posts
  • Onigiri Weekend Digest: Institutional Lens #5

Onigiri Weekend Digest: Institutional Lens #5

🌐 Website | 💼 Linkedln | 📰 Past Editions

Good weekend from Onigiri Capital!

This week, two defining moments capture the political and regulatory power struggle shaping the next phase of global stablecoin adoption.

Recap this Week's Headliners

Both developments underscore a single truth: stablecoins are no longer a crypto issue — they are now instruments of state power in both the East and West. The Fed Fintech Meeting (Oct 21, D.C.) —also showed signals: The Fed moves from adversarial to dialogic: interoperability, “slim master accounts” for payments firms, and stablecoins as AI and tokenization plumbing.

You read and share. We listen and improve. Send us feedback at [email protected].

For daily market updates and airdrop alphas, check out our telegram!

🍙Onigiri Take

The global stablecoin narrative has entered a monetary realpolitik phase. Beijing’s intervention in Hong Kong signals that sovereign currencies cannot coexist with private money, especially when monetary control is strategic. Meanwhile, Washington’s political wrangling shows that stablecoins have crossed the Rubicon into statecraft, no longer viewed as neutral financial tools.

  • China’s move reinforces the dominance of the e-CNY and effectively ends hopes for an offshore CNH stablecoin regime, isolating Hong Kong’s ambitions.

  • Warren’s demands expand U.S. oversight from compliance to integrity of governance, establishing a precedent where who backs a stablecoin is as important as how it operates.

For institutional allocators, the message is clear: The new moat is compliance credibility. The winners of this cycle will not be the most innovative issuers — but those who can navigate political legitimacy and regulatory proximity.

🍙Winners & Losers: Institutional Outlook

Stakeholder

This Week’s Impact

Outlook & Actions

Major Stablecoin Issuers

CNH path shut; U.S. governance bar rising

Double-down on USD issuance, conflict disclosures, ops audits, and Fed-compatible connectivity.

Banks & Financial Institutions

CNH optionality curtailed; U.S. rails opening

Position for tokenized deposits, sweeps to MMFs, and issuer partnerships under GENIUS + Fed guidance.

Regulators

PBoC consolidates; Treasury ascendant

Write interoperability + resilience rules; define red lines on conflicts, interest-like rewards.

Corporates & Enterprises

Higher compliance overhead

Prefer licensed USD rails; require service-level and reversal/recourse designs.

Retail Users & Crypto Natives

Fragmented access; UX still clunky

Gravitate to regulated USD and exchange-integrated flows; watch fees and limits.

Developers & Protocol Founders

Interop + compliance constraints

Build Reg-DeFi variants (policy-aware smart contracts), address-lists, oracle QA.

Institutional Investors & VCs

Policy risk repriced

Favor issuer equity and compliance infra; avoid CNH-dependent theses.

Infrastructure & Service Providers

Tailwinds for risk & reporting

Growth in real-time attestation, incident response, fraud/AI models, Treasury ops.

DAOs & Governance Communities

Lower tolerance for opacity

Hard-code disclosure, key-man/related-party limits, and emergency controls.

Exchanges & Market Infra (CCPs/FCMs/ATSs)

Licensed venues advantaged

Integrate USD stables with clear redemption SLAs; segregate tokenized assets by credit/liquidity tiers.

🍙Under the Hood: State Control, Regulatory Capture, and the Future of “Permissioned” Stablecoins

  1. Beijing’s Command over Capital Mobility
    Hong Kong’s experiment with a CNH-pegged stablecoin has been halted. The PBoC’s directive to Ant Group and JD.com isn’t merely about monetary control — it’s about data control

    A successful offshore CNH stablecoin would have generated non-state transaction data, effectively creating a shadow payment system parallel to the e-CNY. Now, Beijing’s stance aligns its Digital Currency Electronic Payment (DCEP) strategy with capital account containment, ensuring RMB internationalization remains state-managed, not market-driven.

  2. Washington’s Political Oversight Phase
    Warren’s pressure campaign against the Treasury stems from the GENIUS Act’s unintended ambiguities — particularly around conflicts of interest and operational governance. The reference to the World Liberty Financial USD stablecoin and Trump-linked backers underscores a deeper fear: that private issuers could wield political leverage through monetary rails.

The Structural Divergence

  • China’s model: Centralized CBDC dominance, zero tolerance for private fiat proxies.

  • U.S. model: Private-public co-regulation, but with political gatekeeping at the Treasury level.
    The result is a bifurcated stablecoin world — one shaped by state monopoly (East) and political legitimacy (West).

🍙Stablecoin ≠ Crypto — From Open Networks to State-Vetted Money Rails

Stablecoins were once the crypto industry’s Trojan horse into mainstream finance. They are now becoming the state’s firewall against uncontrolled liquidity. The reclassification is underway — stablecoins are no longer “crypto assets,” but regulated financial instruments with sovereign implications.

This shift creates a new design frontier:

  • Permissioned interoperability layers bridging compliant stablecoins with DeFi rails.

  • Tokenized bank money replacing synthetic stablecoins as the preferred institutional format.

  • RegTech-native architecture, where transaction-level attestations replace “proof of reserves.”

The distinction between “crypto” and “digital money” will define institutional adoption. Stablecoins that look like bank deposits will survive. Those that look like tokens will not.

🍙Institutional Risks & Unknowns

Category

Key Concern

Implication

Regulatory Capture

Treasury overreach and political selectivity in GENIUS Act implementation

Issuers may face arbitrary enforcement or politicized licensing.

Monetary Fragmentation

China’s firewall limits CNH interoperability

ASEAN, HK, and offshore RMB liquidity may stagnate.

Operational Integrity

Failures like Paxos’s $3T minting glitch raise systemic questions

Stronger stress testing, multi-sig governance, and Treasury oversight incoming.

Geopolitical Risk

Stablecoins increasingly viewed as strategic infrastructure

Cross-border issuance may require state-level approval, not just compliance.

Market Concentration

USD stablecoins absorbing all liquidity

Creates single-currency dependence and higher contagion risk in global markets.

Onigiri Capital (onigiri.vc), a US$50 million blockchain-focused investment fund, launched by Saison Capital, the venture arm of Japan’s Credit Saison. Onigiri Capital is on a mission to chart the next chapter of finance and invest in seed and Series A blockchain startups in stablecoins, payments, RWAs, DeFi and financial infrastructure. The fund’s strategy emphasizes connecting startups to Asia’s growing digital asset markets.

If you'd like to discuss or contribute to the next Institutional Lens, contact us at [email protected]

Disclaimer: All the information presented in this publication and its affiliates is strictly for educational purposes only. It should not be construed or taken as financial, legal, investment, or any other form of advice.