- StableScope
- Posts
- Onigiri Weekend Digest: Institutional Lens #13
Onigiri Weekend Digest: Institutional Lens #13

🌐 Website | 💼 Linkedln | 📰 Past Editions
Good weekend from Onigiri Capital!
This week’s headlines show the spectrum of where stablecoins are headed: from privately governed capital markets on-chain to fully supervised monetary infrastructure. We see that what began as a crypto-native workaround for payments and settlement is now becoming a strategic instrument for corporate finance, bank balance sheets, and sovereign oversight.
Recap this Week's Headliners
SS #57 - Tether Targets $500B Valuation and Tokenized Equity
SS #58 - FDIC Unveils First Federal Framework for Bank-Led Stablecoin Issuance
On one end of the spectrum, Tether is testing how far a private company can push capital markets without touching an IPO, using tokenized equity to engineer liquidity, valuation control, and investor access on its own terms. On the other hand, the FDIC has begun formalizing how U.S. banks can issue stablecoins within the federal banking system, bringing digital dollars decisively inside the regulatory perimeter. Together, they define the operating range for stablecoins going forward.
Enjoy the read!
You read and share. We listen and improve. Send us feedback at [email protected].
For daily market updates and airdrop alphas, check out our telegram!

🍙Onigiri Take
Stablecoins are no longer shaped by innovation cycles; they are shaped by institutional leverage. The market is now bifurcating into two distinct but converging tracks:
Tether’s strategy demonstrates how scale allows issuers to dictate market structure, liquidity access, and valuation discipline.
The FDIC’s framework demonstrates how the state intends to reclaim monetary credibility without banning innovation.
The result is not decentralization versus regulation. It is private power versus public oversight, both converging on the same infrastructure stack.
The next era of stablecoins will not reward experimentation. It will reward entities that can operate under scrutiny, control distribution, and absorb compliance costs while preserving economic upside.
🍙Winners & Losers: Institutional Outlook
Stakeholder | Impact |
Major Stablecoin Issuers | Winners (Scale Advantage) — Tether reinforces pricing power and narrative dominance; regulated issuers gain legitimacy but face margin compression. |
Banks & Financial Institutions | Winners (Conditional) — Clear regulatory path unlocks issuance, but capital and compliance costs will deter smaller players. |
Regulators | Winners — FDIC framework reasserts supervisory control and reduces systemic opacity. |
Corporates & Enterprises | Winners — Greater confidence to adopt stablecoins for payments, treasury, and settlement once issuers sit within banking perimeter. |
Retail Users & Crypto Natives | Mixed — More safety and stability, but reduced access to high-yield or lightly regulated products. |
Developers & Protocol Founders | Mixed — Infrastructure demand rises; permissioned systems and compliance layers become unavoidable. |
Institutional Investors & VCs | Winners — New asset classes (tokenized equity, bank-issued stablecoins) create scalable, allocatable opportunities. |
Infrastructure & Service Providers | Major Winners — Auditing, custody, compliance, tokenization, and settlement infrastructure see sustained demand. |
DAOs & Governance Communities | Losers (Relative) — Governance narratives weaken as issuance centralizes within corporates and banks. |
Exchanges & Market Infrastructure | Winners — Regulated issuance increases demand for compliant trading, clearing, and secondary markets. |
🍙Under the Hood: Capital Markets Logic Enters On-Chain Finance
Tether: Tokenized Equity as a “Private IPO”
Tether’s exploration of tokenized equity following a planned US$20 billion raise is a landmark moment for real-world assets (RWA). By potentially issuing permissioned, on-chain representations of its own shares—likely via its Hadron platform—Tether is attempting to:
Provide controlled secondary liquidity without a public listing
Preserve valuation discipline and cap-table control
Validate its own tokenization infrastructure using the most valuable balance sheet in crypto
This is RWA at its highest stakes: not pilot bonds or niche funds, but corporate equity of a systemically important issuer. If successful, it establishes a blueprint for late-stage private companies to bypass traditional IPO pathways entirely.
FDIC: Stablecoins Enter the Banking Perimeter
The FDIC’s initiation of a federal framework for bank-led stablecoin issuance operationalizes the GENIUS Act. Key elements include:
Issuance via regulated subsidiaries
Full asset backing with liquid reserves
Mandatory audits and transparent ownership structures
Upcoming capital and liquidity requirements
This shifts stablecoins from regulatory ambiguity into explicit bank supervision, setting the foundation for institutional adoption at scale. The trade-off is cost: compliance, capital, and governance thresholds will be meaningful barriers to entry.
Future Trends Emerging from Both Headlines
Permissioned markets will dominate institutional flows, both for equity and stablecoins
Balance-sheet credibility becomes the moat, not yield or growth alone
Tokenization shifts from experimentation to corporate finance strategy
Infrastructure, not apps, captures long-term value
🍙Stablecoin ≠ Crypto — Stablecoins as Balance-Sheet Infrastructure
Stablecoins are no longer a proxy for crypto risk. They are becoming neutral financial rails—akin to SWIFT, ACH, or money-market funds—implemented with blockchain technology.
Tether’s move is about capital markets engineering, not DeFi ideology
The FDIC’s framework is about payments safety and monetary control, not crypto innovation
The market is finally pricing stablecoins as infrastructure, not speculative assets.
🍙Institutional Risks & Unknowns
Despite regulatory momentum, several uncertainties remain:
Securities risk: Tokenized equity may invite multi-jurisdictional enforcement despite permissioning.
Issuer concentration: A handful of entities could dominate global on-chain liquidity.
Cost of compliance: FDIC capital rules may crowd out fintech-led issuance entirely.
Liquidity optics: Permissioned secondary markets risk shallow price discovery.
Global fragmentation: Divergent regulatory regimes may create incompatible stablecoin standards.


Onigiri Capital (onigiri.vc), a US$50 million blockchain-focused investment fund, launched by Saison Capital, the venture arm of Japan’s Credit Saison. Onigiri Capital is on a mission to chart the next chapter of finance and invest in seed and Series A blockchain startups in stablecoins, payments, RWAs, DeFi and financial infrastructure. The fund’s strategy emphasizes connecting startups to Asia’s growing digital asset markets.
If you'd like to discuss or contribute to the next Institutional Lens, contact us at [email protected]
Disclaimer: All the information presented in this publication and its affiliates is strictly for educational purposes only. It should not be construed or taken as financial, legal, investment, or any other form of advice.